Re: Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-05 Thread Kenton Varda
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Alain M. wrote: > BTW, is there a users' list about Chrome? I'm sure there is, but I don't have any easier way of finding out than just Googling it. :) > > > Alain > > Olivier Gautherot escreveu: > > Hi Kenton, thanks for the insight. > > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 20

Re: Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-05 Thread Alain M.
Interesting... Google's Chrome is the only browser that dos NOT work google's stuff ;) BTW, is there a users' list about Chrome? Alain Olivier Gautherot escreveu: > Hi Kenton, thanks for the insight. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Kenton Varda > wrote: > >

Re: Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-05 Thread Kenton Varda
Yes, I've specifically had that sort of problem with Chrome, and clearing cookies fixed it in my case. I don't have any other ideas, sorry. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Olivier Gautherot wrote: > Hi Kenton, thanks for the insight. > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Kenton Varda wrote: > >>

Re: Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-05 Thread Olivier Gautherot
Hi Kenton, thanks for the insight. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Kenton Varda wrote: > Hmm, works for me. This may sound silly, but try deleting all your > google.com-related cookies. I've seen redirect loops in google services > fixed by this before. As a matter of fact, IE and Firefox wo

Re: Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-05 Thread Kenton Varda
Hmm, works for me. This may sound silly, but try deleting all your google.com-related cookies. I've seen redirect loops in google services fixed by this before. On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:36 AM, wrote: > > Hi! > > I tried to access the online doc at > http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/

Pb with online doc on website?

2009-01-02 Thread olivier
Hi! I tried to access the online doc at http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/overview.html but, for some reason, it reports a loop in the links. It seems to be a general problem as all the docs I tried to open reported the same. I know it used to work in the past. I guess someone tr