I was messing around in Visual Studio and tried this modification:
google::protobuf::Closure* closure =
google::protobuf::NewCallbackClosureTest,const DummyResponse*(ct,
ClosureTest::MethodWithArg, dr);
and it worked. Is explicitly specifying the template parameters the
preferred solution?
On
The problem is that the parameter binding that you are providing has type
DummyResponse* but the method you are trying to bind takes const
DummyResponse*. Even though the former is implicitly convertible to the
latter, the compiler will not consider this when selecting a template
overload. The
C++ Protocol Buffers use UTF-8 for all text encoding, regardless of
platform. If you want to use some other encoding in your code, you will
have to manually convert between that and UTF-8 when interacting with
Protocol Buffers.
In Java and Python everything is taken care of automatically, since
That makes perfect sense---thanks.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
The problem is that the parameter binding that you are providing has type
DummyResponse* but the method you are trying to bind takes const
DummyResponse*. Even though the former is
Thanks for fixing the docs, Henner.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Henner Zeller h.zel...@acm.org wrote:
And yeah, documentation needs to be fixed.
On Aug 28, 2009 1:35 PM, Omnifarious omnifari...@gmail.com wrote:
An example from
I just installed Snow Leopard, which ships with:
$ gcc --version
i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There
is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY
What compiler flags are you using? Since you were able to compile
libprotobuf itself, I assume you have turned on additional warnings for your
own project?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Haberman jhaber...@gmail.comwrote:
I just installed Snow Leopard, which ships with:
$ gcc
Good point, this was with -Wextra (which I had forgotten I compile
with). I can understand if you're not interested in accommodating
this. It is strange that -Wextra warns about this for this particular
gcc version, but not others that I've tried.
On Aug 31, 4:49 pm, Kenton Varda
On Aug 31, 5:17 pm, Michael Poole mdpo...@troilus.org wrote:
Joshua Haberman writes:
The protobuf library compiled and installed fine, but the generated
classes threw warnings (and since I was compiling with -Werror, failed
to compile). The warning was:
