I am wondering if it is needed the c++11 version to compile protobuf 3
because when I run the make file it is asking me to change the line in it
and write -std=c++11
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this
mainly, I need to pass serialized array to MPI to transfer - MPI needs type
information and size information, MPI_CHAR will treat the buffer as char*,
MPI_BYTE will treat the buffer as byte stream. I am a bit fuzzy on which
type I should use? Also, if it is a c-string, maybe I don't have to
Starting from version 3.6 we require C++11. You shouldn't have to manually
edit any makefiles, though--could you provide some more details on the
problem and what version you're using?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:18 PM wrote:
> I am wondering if it is needed the c++11 version to compile protobuf
I don't have any experience with MPI, but I would recommend using
SerializeToString() instead of SerializeToArray(). SerializeToString() is
simpler and easier because you don't have to worry about creating an array
of the correct size. Once you have serialized to a std::string, you can
just call
actually, this is also the part that confuses me some: suppose I serialize
it to string. string.data() will return me a c-string according to c++
reference (I read it somewhere that since c++11, string.c_str() and
string.data() both will return null-terminated string). Even
protocolbuf
That is true that std::string will make sure to put a null character right
after the end of your string, so if you have a string s then
s.data()[s.size()] will be '\0'. However, there is nothing preventing null
characters from also appearing inside the string itself. So if you're
working with
Hi,
I am currently writing the java code to check the number of messages in a
protocol buffer file *.pb
I would like to know if there is meta-data or header that contains the
information of number of messages in the protobuf file? I am looping
through the whole file, and I think there should