Ok. Finally I was able to get 46.8804 milliseconds. This should be
pretty sufficient for file size 300 KB generated by serializing the
output. Thanks again.
Regards,
Shirish
On Mar 19, 11:23 am, ShirishKul shirish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kenton,
Thanks for pointing this out...
I have not
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:23 PM, ShirishKul shirish...@gmail.com wrote:
Output in my case is a file to which i'm writing.
But again, this doesn't seem to be matching with what your throughput
is. Do I still need to make changes to seek more optimum results?
What happens if you serialize to
