Hey all,
I ran across the following and thought it may be of interest to this
list:
http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2009/09/activemq-protobuf-implementation-rocks.html
Best,
Ismael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi all,
In case you enjoy success stories: at LogicBlox we have recently
started using Protocol Buffers for a protocol between our Datalog
database server (written in C++) and our Datalog compiler (written in
Java). We use protobuf in two different configurations: over sockets
between separate
Hi Kenton,
For the problem I observed, the Refresh() call hang on a message of 2
bytes. I'll try to reproduce a small example and get back to you.
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
That Refresh() call should only block if there are no bytes
Hello all,
I am having trouble figuring out how to serialize data over a socket
utilizing UDP protocol. I am in C++ environment. When writing to the
socket without protocol buffers, I use the standard sendto() socket
call which allows me to specify the port and IP address of the
intended
One other thing I wanted to say was that I chose to use
CodedOutputStream to send
data because ultimately I have to manually encode a length prefix in
front of my PB message.
With the C++ environment, I understand that this is the only way to do
this (ugh is right; I am sure this is a common
Hmm, your bean and buffer classes sound conceptually equivalent to my
builder and message classes.
Regarding lazy parsing, this is certainly something we've considered before,
but it introduces a lot of problems:
1) Every getter method must now first check whether the message is parsed,
and parse
I think the usual way we would have solved this problem at Google would be
to have the message payload be encoded separately and embedded in the
envelope as a bytes field, e.g.:
message Envelope {
required string to_address = 1;
optional string from_address = 2;
required bytes
Firstly, I want to clarify that I did not write the benchmark that I
plugged into. There is no ill intent. I published the benchmark so
that folks take the time to look into why my implementation performed
so much better. I think it's good to have healthy discussions about
the pros and cons of
Would you like to be your own boss and work from home?We guarantee
that you will be paid $15 to $25 per email that you process
successfully.
http://processemailonline.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
