I am getting the following warning message from the compiler while
compiling my program with google protocol buffers using g++ (gcc
version 4.1.2 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)) with a -Wall option.
/usr/include/google/protobuf/io/coded_stream.h: In member function
'bool
I want to know which of the following implementation is better in
terms of performance and usability. Option A is much easier and
portable across different protobuf versions. Is it worth the trouble
trying to go with Option B? In my tests, I could not find much of a
performance gain by using
Hi,
I'm trying to compile protobuffers but i'm having some problems at
make...
Here are some informations about the errors :
I run configure with the following parameters and it doesn't show any
errors..
bash-3.00$ ./configure CC=/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc --disable-64bit-solaris
checking build
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 17:04, ury ury.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It was EBCDIC vs. ASCII issues.
If anyone is interested in iSeries/zSeries porting issues, or protobuf
on EBCDIC, I'll be glad to help
In particular if you needed to modify the source and have a patch it
might be interesting
I want to add an array of double to protobuf message object. I already
have an array of doubles allocated in my program, and I want to
serialize this information. Currently, I am doing this by adding
individual elements as follows:
for(unsigned i=0; i size; i++) {
//
OK, I think I found the solution.
On Aug 16, 11:40 am, Doug Coburn dougco...@gmail.com wrote:
#
# Build instructions
mkdir generated
protoc --cpp_out=./generated *.proto
g++ -c generated/base.pb.cc -o
No, there is not. Sorry.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Prakash Rao prakashrao1...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out ways to set initial capacity for my repeatable
fields (proto java 2.3.0). I looked at the generated code and it
creates an ArrayList but without initial capacity
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Patrick doherty.patr...@gmail.com wrote:
import foo_pb2
import bar_pb2
Shouldn't these be:
import MyProtos.foo_pb2
import MyProtos.bar_pb2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to
No, sorry. .proto files are intended to be language-neutral, so they cannot
depend on code written in a specific language.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Peng dupeng...@gmail.com wrote:
When we define the type of a filed, it could be Scalar Value Types,
Enumerations, and other Message.
You can reuse Google's code under the terms of the New BSD license. See:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/COPYING.txt
The license is extremely permissive.
You should provide your code generator as a protoc plugin, so that it may be
invoked using the same command as all
No, the warning is not specific to your system. I believe we fixed these
warnings in version 2.3.0 -- maybe you should upgrade?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:17 AM, nirajshr niraj...@gmail.com wrote:
I am getting the following warning message from the compiler while
compiling my program with
Option B avoids an extra copy of the data. It should work with all versions
of protocol buffers. Use it if profiling shows a lot of time spent in this
code, otherwise use whichever version you find easier to follow.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, nirajshr niraj...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Vali valentin.adr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile protobuffers but i'm having some problems at
make...
Here are some informations about the errors :
I run configure with the following parameters and it doesn't show any
errors..
bash-3.00$
Incidentally, my understanding is that the C++ standard says that dynamic
initializers only need to be run before the first time the module is
accessed (not necessarily before main()). Thus, if your program contains no
symbols referring to the module, then it will never be accessed, and dynamic
BTW
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:51 AM, nirajshr niraj...@gmail.com wrote:
repeated DoubleData bucketDouble = 2;
You should declare this field packed:
repeated DoubleData bucketDouble = 2 [packed=true];
This will improve efficiency on the wire.
--
You received this message because you
How about this way-more-readable variant of option B:
add_double_vector(deal_pb.bucket(i).bucketdouble().data(),
deal_pb.bucket(i).bucketdouble().size());
This assumes that add_bouble_vector only needs a const pointer. If it needs
a non-const pointer, add the
I agree that defaults should be handled in the library. I have been putting
off the issue because i found the interaction between the hasX and getX
methods confusing when a default is specified. hasX returns false if x
isn't explicitly set, but getX may or may not return a valid value anyway
17 matches
Mail list logo
