Comment #4 on issue 336 by eyal.far...@gmail.com: Support generic string
type
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=336
Hi,
As I replied in the group, there's always the possibility of achieving this
with a plugin.
GPB probably won't support custom strings classes as the actual
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Scott Saad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for adding a link!
>
> We'd like to accept patches. However, we don't have enough engineering
>> resources to maintain another platform. Supporting a different platform
>> requires much testing work in the release process (
Hello,
Thank you for adding a link!
We'd like to accept patches. However, we don't have enough engineering
> resources to maintain another platform. Supporting a different platform
> requires much testing work in the release process (also user support). I'd
> suggest to keep the C++ builder
Comment #3 on issue 336 by olafvds...@gmail.com: Support generic string type
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=336
Compare 1, 2 and 3. Which one looks cleaner?
array a();
string s();
vector v();
1. { auto z = a(); b.set_field(z.data(), z.size()); }
2. b.set_field(s());
3. { au
