[protobuf] Re: suggestions on improving the performance?

2012-01-13 Thread alok
any suggestions? experiences? regards, Alok On Jan 11, 1:16 pm, alok alok.jad...@gmail.com wrote: my point is ..should i have one message something like Message Record{   required HeaderMessage header;   optional TradeMessage trade;   repeated QuoteMessage quotes; // 0 or more   repeated

[protobuf] Re: Issue 311 in protobuf: PyPI packages cannot be installed with PIP

2012-01-13 Thread protobuf
Comment #6 on issue 311 by d.fleisc...@gmail.com: PyPI packages cannot be installed with PIP http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=311 Is there a solution for this issue to be expected? Installation also fails on SLES 11, where I need to install an application depending on

Re: [protobuf] Re: suggestions on improving the performance?

2012-01-13 Thread Daniel Wright
It's extremely unlikely that text parsing is faster than binary parsing on pretty much any message. My guess is that there's something wrong in the way you're reading the binary file -- e.g. no buffering, or possibly a bug where you hand the protobuf library multiple messages concatenated

Re: [protobuf] Re: suggestions on improving the performance?

2012-01-13 Thread Henner Zeller
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:22, Daniel Wright dwri...@google.com wrote: It's extremely unlikely that text parsing is faster than binary parsing on pretty much any message.  My guess is that there's something wrong in the way you're reading the binary file -- e.g. no buffering, or possibly a bug