[protobuf] Re: Issue 628 in protobuf: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 628 by xiaof...@google.com: Update ThirdPartyAddOns link to protobuf-c http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=628 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send a

Re: [protobuf] Add link to rust protobuf implementation

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote: > 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Stepan Koltsov < > stepan.kolt...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > there's a protobuf implementation in Rust and for Rust (I'm the > author): > > >

Re: [protobuf] Add link to rust protobuf implementation

'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Stepan Koltsov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > there's a protobuf implementation in Rust and for Rust (I'm the author): > > > > https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/ > > > > Please, add this link to Third-Party Add-ons p

Re: [protobuf] Add link to rust protobuf implementation

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Stepan Koltsov wrote: > Hi, > > there's a protobuf implementation in Rust and for Rust (I'm the author): > > https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/ > > Please, add this link to Third-Party Add-ons page: > https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAdd

[protobuf] Add link to rust protobuf implementation

Hi, there's a protobuf implementation in Rust and for Rust (I'm the author): https://github.com/stepancheg/rust-protobuf/ Please, add this link to Third-Party Add-ons page: https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns -- Stepa -- You received this message because you are subscri

Re: [protobuf] protobuf-java 2.4.X and 2.5.0 are incompatible

One case where generated APIs are not backward compatible: https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493 On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 7:22:41 PM UTC-7, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Patrick Wendell > wrote: > > Established based on what conventions? > > On

[protobuf] Re: Issue 493 in protobuf: protobuf-java (2.5.0) GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented

Comment #16 on issue 493 by sjl...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0) GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493 I agree with @owen's comments. Yes, it is ideal that all users of hadoop upgrade to the protobuf version that the ha