Re: [protobuf] binary compatibility between versions 2.x and 3.x

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Scott Sue wrote: > Hi Feng, > > Apologies, what I was meaning was that with the introduction of protobuf > 3.2.0 now, is 3.2.0 binary compatible with protobuf 2.5.0? Or does you > original message reply still hold true? > No, 3.2.0

Re: [protobuf] binary compatibility between versions 2.x and 3.x

Hi Feng, Apologies, what I was meaning was that with the introduction of protobuf 3.2.0 now, is 3.2.0 binary compatible with protobuf 2.5.0? Or does you original message reply still hold true? Regards, Scott SCOTT SUE CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER Support Line : +44(0) 2031 371 603 Mobile :

Re: [protobuf] Type URLs and Any types

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Feng Xiao wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Josh Humphries > wrote: > >> The protobuf docs for the Any type >>

Re: [protobuf] binary compatibility between versions 2.x and 3.x

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Scott Sue wrote: > Hi Feng, > > Is this still the case considering that 3.2.0 is out that allows the > version number to be used by protoc? > Not sure what you are asking, but 3.0.0 generated code should work with 3.2.0 runtime and 3.2.0

Re: [protobuf] Type URLs and Any types

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Josh Humphries wrote: > The protobuf docs for the Any type > > talk about the URL being a real URL, where an HTTP GET request will reply >

Re: [protobuf] binary compatibility between versions 2.x and 3.x

Hi Feng, Is this still the case considering that 3.2.0 is out that allows the version number to be used by protoc? General * Added protoc version number to protoc plugin protocol. It can be used by protoc plugin to detect which version of protoc is used with the plugin and mitigate known