It's on the SVN head now, see
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=349
Will make a release candidate soon.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Zachary Turner divisorthe...@gmail.comwrote:
Just wanted to follow up on this and see if this is still on target to
be released within a month
Thanks for reporting this. Working on a fix now.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michael michael.ol...@gmail.com wrote:
Using the normal mvn package/install commands, the size of the jar
files generated by Maven for 2.4.0 is identical for the normal and
lite versions. This is not true under
can update the pom.xml with this one:
http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn-history/r373/trunk/java/pom.xml
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. Working on a fix now.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michael michael.ol
It isn't officially announced yet, but the files are on the site, feel free
to try it out. We are still working on the documentation. The final release
would be very soon.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:17 AM, CB cn...@verizon.net wrote:
I'm considering updating from 2.3.0 to 2.4.0, but it seems
The final release of 2.4.0a Protobuf is uploaded:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
Note that 2.4.0a fixed a java protobuf-lite build problem in 2.4.0. If you
are using the 2.4.0 version, please upgrade to 2.4.0a (the only diff is the
java protobuf-lite problem).
Documentation
2.4.0a is officially released now.
Please check:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:12 AM, David Dabbs dmda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
From what I gather catching up on list messages, 2.4 is final, but not
officially released, perhaps because some
The protobuf in android source code is a branched protobuf for google voice,
which is not intended for public use, and may change in the future.
Generally, you should use the opensource version of protobuf in your app,
set the option optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME; in your proto file and use
the
You probably need to break up your proto files to eliminate the circular
dependency.. (i.e. have multiple .proto files for a package, and only import
necessary .proto files).
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Ken ke.lane@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have two proto files: A.proto and B.proto. If I
A workaround is now in svn:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=380
Could you please try patch the diff to check if that fixes the problem?
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:06 PM, dear chap dear.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately we have to use the particular compiler in
Right. Please see the document in
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html
The protocol compiler searches for imported files in a set of directories
specified on the protocol compiler command line using the
-I/--proto_pathflag. If no flag was given, it looks in the directory
in
I'm a bit concerned about setting arbitrary proto compiler via
environment variables. Protobuf runtime library requires exactly
matching protoc generated classes to work. Separating the protoc and
library potentially increased the risk of having incompatibility
errors. Not sure if this would bring
OK, it turns out we will use whatever protoc in the PATH as a fail
over. This change is probably fine then.
Sent you a code review. Also add a warning message if the protoc is
set via env variable.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
I'm a bit concerned about
You can find the algorithm in source code.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_helpers.cc
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Ravi ravikumarkulan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Thanks a lot for your time.
Yes the approach looks very clean as the
Looks like pthread library is missing. This should have been covered
by the acx_pthread.m4 script. Could you please try to manually run the
linker(the g++ line you pasted in email), by adding extra -pthread
and/or -lpthread parameters?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Evol mverre...@gmail.com
message, it seems android NDK doesn't require any
flags to link pthread...
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
Looks like pthread library is missing. This should have been covered
by the acx_pthread.m4 script. Could you please try to manually run the
linker(the g
No, there's no version backward-compatibility like this. protobuf library
only works with the matching protoc generated files.
There's a feature
requesthttp://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=210q=status%3DAcceptedcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20FixedIn%20Owner%20Summaryasking
protobuf officially does not provide this function. There might be some 3rd
party libraries though.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Sankar sankar.curios...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use protocolbuffers as a storage database for my
application, as it provides data-format-versioning
sankar.curios...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Sankar P sankar.curios...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
protobuf officially does not provide this function. There might be some
3rd
party libraries though.
I did
This is due to the gcc 3.x bug. A workaround is submitted in svn
r380http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=380.
You can use svn head version, or patch the r380, or wait for the coming
2.4.1 release (soon).
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Inderjeet Singh inder...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Also, you can upgrade your gcc to 4.3+ if possible.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
This is due to the gcc 3.x bug. A workaround is submitted in svn
r380http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=380.
You can use svn head version, or patch
You might want to have a benchmark for this. Allocation in Java is cheap,
but would increase the GC costs; resetting builder will introduce some CPU
overhead (recursively setting data members and bit masks).
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM, David Dabbs dmda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I have a
Yes, you should use AddAllocated() in this case. Noted that the ownership of
the object will be passed to the wrapper proto.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Aaron Rich aaron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the method:
AddAllocated(Element*)
which I think will add the Pong* that I have already
Looks like a classpath problem for the easy mock.. Could you please double
check if net.sf.cglib.proxy.Enhancer is installed and set in the classpath
of your environment?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:40 AM, danbaatar danwalke...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compile version 2.3.0 (for
I see, so you are using JDK1.5. Will send out a fix for this.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:07 AM, CRozeboom clrozeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed maven and am trying to build the java jar files for a
project. I've tried this on a Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.10 system with
the same results. I've
This is because JDK 1.5 doesn't allow @Override to annotate a method that
implements part of an interface. The compatibility issue is fixed in svn
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=384
You can either patch the diff, or wait for the next release (2.4.1) soon.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011
The v2.4.1 Protobuf is uploaded:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
v2.4.1 is a bug fix release for v2.4.0 and v2.4.0a.
CHANGES
2011-05-01 version 2.4.1:
C++
* Fixed the frendship problem for old compilers to make the library now
gcc 3
compatible again.
* Fixed
Strange, looks like the serialization parsing are completely broken in
MSVC 2010. Have you ever installed early versions? Could you please try a
clean build?
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Mark S m...@bakedbeans.com wrote:
This also fails with the new 2.4.1 release using MSVC 2010 SP1.
--
We discussed internally and decided not to make the hashCode()
return deterministic result. If you need consistent hashcode in different
runs, use toByteString().hashCode().
Quoted from Kenton:
Hashing the content of the descriptor would actually be incorrect, because
two descriptors with
Does setting higher heap memories in jvm flags(i.e. -Xmx) help?
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:23 PM, bogl sviridov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to create generated-sources and generated-test-sources
files for protobuf-2.4.1 (java), but getting an error message:
[INFO]
+robinson
The ParseFromString() in python now always returns None. Note the
MergeFromString() returns the number of bytes read, but there's a TODO to
make that always return None. Will may have some ideas about this.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:22 PM, jsia jsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I created
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, aara aara.cool...@gmail.com wrote:
I actually have 3 questions.
1.When we specify default values for optional fields,the default value
gets assigned automatically when we ourselves dont assign it a value.
But why doesnt the has_member field get set to 1??? It
Yes, you can. See:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#generating
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:39 PM, jonason jonason...@hotmail.com wrote:
can I set multi proto_path?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
We also have another internal thread talking about the restriction support
for protobuf. Basically we think the restriction or value validation
function of protobuf should be implemented in the upper layer due to various
concerns..
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Marco Tedone
That one will parse from binary encoded data. Looks like your
sample_message.txt is in ASCII format. In short:
Binary format:
serialize: msg.writeTo() / msg.toByteArray()
parsing: MyMessage.parseFrom() / builder.mergeFrom()
ASCII format:
serialize: msg.toString() / TextFormat.printToString()
You can probably use sub-builders in this case: e.g.
myBuilder.getPriceBuilder().setValue(123);
See
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/java-generated.html#messagein
sub builders section.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:58 PM, veaven vea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What's the
Quoted from our internal discussion by Kenton:
You should build a MapDescriptor, Message upfront, mapping every
descriptor you care about to the corresponding default instance. Avoid
using Class objects because that will make your code incompatible with
DynamicMessage. Using default instances
This shouldn't happen.. That means your unfiltered C also contains
uninitialized messages.. Did you add new required fields in your .proto file
(or change optional to required)?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:55 AM, ksamdev samvel.khalat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got nested messages like:
This is because EnumValueDescriptor doesn't override toString(). You can use
getName() and getValue() in the EnumValueDescriptor to read the value.
EnumValueDescriptor is defined in com.google.protobuf.Descriptors
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Nik Hodgkinson 11x...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
+Gregory
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Marco Tedone marco.ted...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Is there a reason why the plugin hasn't been uploaded to Maven
Central? If you want I could take ownership of that but then I'd have
to be the owner of the com.google.protobuf Maven groupId, which I
protobuf-c is a 3rd party plugin/branch, which is not in official protobuf
release. You may need to contact the author directly.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Greg Corradini gregcorrad...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile protobuf-c-0.15 on Ubuntu-10.10. I've been
running into
Please take a look at the vsprojects/readme.txt
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Enrico Viappiani viappi...@gmail.comwrote:
Let me ask a stupid question.. I have to install protobuf 2.4.1 C++,
in windows 7 64 bit.
I've done that in ubuntu, but i don't have seen the installation
instruction
The protoc reads the input from STDIN. If you pass the payload file name as
parameter, protoc will treat that file as a .proto file. You should pipe
the payload to protoc instead.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ravi ravikumarkulan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to convert a protobuf
.
Failed to parse input.
Thanks,
Ravikumar K
On Jul 5, 7:06 pm, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
The protoc reads the input from STDIN. If you pass the payload file name
as
parameter, protoc will treat that file as a .proto file. You should
pipe
the payload to protoc instead
Which language are you using? In c++, you can call
message::GetDescriptor()-FindFieldByNumber() to get a FieldDescriptor; then
call GetReflection()-Set* functions.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:58 AM, SM makkapati.suma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to set the field value by the tag
In the common.h, we have a using namespace std;, and we use string
directly in runtime libraries. However, we use ::std::string in generated
file; you need to modify the proto compiler to support different string
allocators. We do have custom allocator support in our TODO list internally,
but
makkapati.suma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using java I found the corresponding methods in java. Thanks for
the quick response.
On Jul 8, 3:08 am, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
Which language are you using? In c++, you can call
message::GetDescriptor()-FindFieldByNumber() to get
In C++ protobuf, each message owns its fields. That said, two different
messages cannot share a sub-message, which will complicate the system when
releasing resources.
In your case, if you always need to copy the records, there may be a better
design. For instance, keep the records in a global
Not sure if I understand your question correctly. You can set the label in
FieldDescriptorProto:
LABEL_OPTIONAL = 1;
LABEL_REQUIRED = 2;LABEL_REPEATED = 3;
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Giancarlo Frison gfri...@chelab.comwrote:
There is this example that I'm approaching to
I didn't see any test failures from your log:
[==] 764 tests from 102 test cases ran. (3249 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 764 tests.
The ERROR logs are expected, to test the protoc complains in some
situations.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Chris Morris chriswillmor...@gmail.comwrote:
So
The SetExtension() is mentioned in the example. The accessors mentioned in
the following paragraph are similar to the SetExtension template function.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Chris Morris chriswillmor...@gmail.comwrote:
Should the Extensions section in the Language Guide (
See my response in the other thread. You can set label to the
FieldDescriptorProto.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Giancarlo Frison gfri...@chelab.comwrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to create descriptors dynamically for generating custom
message on the fly.
The trouble is when I have to
Quote:
Foo foo;
foo.SetExtension(bar, 15);
Similarly, the Foo class defines templated accessors HasExtension(),
ClearExtension(), GetExtension(), MutableExtension(), and AddExtension().
end quote
To re-write the sentence: Similarly to the SetExtension() mentioned in the
above example, the Foo
'DescriptorProtos.DescriptorProto.Builder', is it correct? How I can
do to describe a complex type field?
Thanks!
On Jul 26, 8:21 pm, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
Not sure if I understand your question correctly. You can set the
label in
FieldDescriptorProto
The size isn't correct. Please run mvn clean; then mvn package -P lite
The correct size is around 80k
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:12 AM, sanjoy sanjoy.gh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a version of protobuf for Android? I built the lite
version of protobuf-2.4.1 and its 450KB. That's
Can you try to print the DebugString() of the message containing unknown
fields? One possibility is you used the wrong message type to parse the
bytes.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Michael Videlgauz mich...@videlgauz.comwrote:
Hello!
I am now investigating a bug in my program under
The document generally said you can use the same extension number for
different level of options, but the qualified extension name needs to be
unique. e.g. a single extension name cannot extend more than one type. That
said, you probably have to use different option name for the purpose.
Note,
You can use protobuf-lite for Android (see the java/README.txt); for iphone,
there are some 3rd-party add-ons for object-c. Take a look at
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Visionweb olang...@gmail.com wrote:.
Hello,
Just a question. Is
Done. Thanks for the work.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Peter Hultqvist pe...@endnode.se wrote:
Hello
I have been working on this c# code generating Protocol Buffers
implementation for a while and now I dare to announce it.
https://silentorbit.com/**protobuf/
There's no lite-runtime for python. It's generally reflection based.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Slava slavaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to use lite runtime for the subj?
Thanks in advance.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
You cannot set default values for messages (or fields in message). You would
have to create default instances of ColorData in your code.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Werner werner.van.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
message ColorData
{
required int32 red =263;
required int32 green
Take a look at Python API.
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/python-generated.html#extension
There are few examples of how to use extensions in Python.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Dave dave.johns...@me.com wrote:
Hi, I have a C++ based service that uses messages
Added to http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns
Thanks for the work!
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:28 PM, jpa petteri.aimo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is my ansi-C implementation of Protocol Buffers for memory-
restricted embedded devices:
http://koti.kapsi.fi/jpa/nanopb/
Probably this quarter. There are still couple of memory issues for the
experimental C++ implementation for python that we'd like to fix before next
release.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Chris Morris chriswillmor...@gmail.comwrote:
When is the next version coming out?
--
You received this
Sorry, I mean Q4 2011.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Pherl Liu liuj...@google.com wrote:
Probably this quarter. There are still couple of memory issues for the
experimental C++ implementation for python that we'd like to fix before next
release.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Chris
There are plenty of APIs for different IOs including string, array, please
take a look at the message_lite.h. Also you can implement your own
ZeroCopyStream for your IO layer.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:23 AM, anand anand.aru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
Is it possible to use protobuf
I assume you want to use generated class. In that case, you can keep a map
from Descriptor to the default instance. Then when you get the
FieldDescriptor, you can get the containing type Descriptor; then look up
the map the get the default instance, and call newBuilderForType() to get
the
Can you use addChildBuilder() API for the repeated field, and then call
addGrandChildBuilder() in the returned builder?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:24 AM, users moofis...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on a solution to basically allow me to persist any
protocol buffer with hibernate.
You cannot clear the unknown fields in a message because messages are
immutable. However, you can parse the bytes into a builder, and then clear
the unknowns fields there.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash
ashwin.jayaprak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have 2 simple messages
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Scott Saad saa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for adding a link!
We'd like to accept patches. However, we don't have enough engineering
resources to maintain another platform. Supporting a different platform
requires much testing work in the release
Could you please post the error logs?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Wei Cheng che...@garena.com wrote:
The lite-test passes well.
The tests either crash (release mode always, debug mode sometimes) or
failed 12 tests of CommandLineInterfaceTests.
Is there anyone else has the same problem?
It sounds like a memory ownership issue. Basically the message object owns
the fields (including the unknown fields). From the stack trace, the string
is probably freed before the destructor is called. Could you please write a
simple function that could reproduce this issue?
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012
The function name is determined by the source proto file path. Looks like
you always generate messages from a single .proto file. You would have to
generate the message in different files. Otherwise, even if you worked
around the function name issue, the runtime DescriptorPool would complained
The internal version is already c++11 compatible. It will be included in
the next release.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brian Nesbitt brian.nesb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello folks,
Protobuf 2.4.1 fails to build using gcc 4.7.0 (on CentOS 6.2) with the
C++11 standard enabled (-std=c++11). The
Unfortunately no.. You could, however, put the Emessages opCode in the
MsgFirst message (instead of in the MsgHeader). Then you can specify the
default value for the EMessages to MSG_FIRST.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Barzo dba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to PB and I would ask a
74 matches
Mail list logo
