Does anyone have any insight on Evan's related question below?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Evan Jones ev...@mit.edu wrote:
Related question: If I am writing length-prefixed values, what is the best
way to do this? I think there are 3 approaches:
1. out.WriteVarint32(msg.ByteSize());
If an example is helpful, I wrote a protoc plugin that adds c++
support for JSON in the format expected by closure-library's
goog.proto2. Depending on your needs it likely won't meet them out of
the box, but it could be helpful as an example.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-plugin-closure/
Any thoughts on better google-glog integration?
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Hochhaus, Andrew ahochh...@samegoal.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to configure protobuf to use google-glog (instead of
the LogMessage stub)? The alternatives that I can see are to use a
LogHandler to proxy
Hi,
Is it possible to configure protobuf to use google-glog (instead of
the LogMessage stub)? The alternatives that I can see are to use a
LogHandler to proxy logging through to glog or modify protobuf to
directly use glog [1].
If these are the only options, would the protobuf project consider
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:56 AM, hsl4125 qlhuang...@gmail.com wrote:
ActionScript 3.0 has no int64 type.
How can use int64 in ActionScript 3.0??
I'm not sure about ActionScript, but I have worked with 64-bit values
in JavaScript protocol buffers so some of the following may be helpful
to you.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:54 AM, jd unicom...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any plans for code generating javascript (using typed
arrays) so we can use protocol buffers directly in the browser
(chrome, mozilla, safari)
This does not used typed arrays, but closure-library contains a
javascript