Fwd: [protobuf] Re: Cross-compiling protobuf to 32-bit
Sorry, forwarding to list as well. -- Forwarded message -- From: Stas Oskin stas.os...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:27 PM Subject: Re: [protobuf] Re: Cross-compiling protobuf to 32-bit To: Kenton Varda ken...@google.com Hi. And when you configure other autotool-based packages the same way, it works? Yes, it is. You said you were using the -m32 flag. Where is it? It actually broke the compilation, and didn't let it finish. Is there any one using a correct cross-architecture compile on RedHat? Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: Communication methods
Hi. Thanks for the tip, any idea if the plain UNIX pipes are working with protobuf? Regards. 2009/5/25 Christopher Smith cbsm...@gmail.com http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/RPCImplementations On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:42 PM, SyRenity stas.os...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. Sorry if this was already asked in the past, but does Protocol Buffers provide some IPC communication methods? Or they provide the data encapsulation, and I should use any method I want? Regards. -- Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
