Re: [protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-03-03 Thread Adewale Oshineye
On 28 February 2010 18:09, Henner Zeller henner.zel...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use

[protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-02-28 Thread Adewale Oshineye
Hi all, Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use different on-disk and on-the-wire representations? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group.

Re: [protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-02-28 Thread Henner Zeller
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use different on-disk and on-the-wire representations? Looks like they fell into