On 28 February 2010 18:09, Henner Zeller henner.zel...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
Hi all,
Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
different on-disk and on-the-wire representations?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
different on-disk and on-the-wire representations?
Looks like they fell into