[protobuf] Re: Issue 251 in protobuf: Suggestion for performance improvement with Python

2011-01-18 Thread protobuf


Comment #2 on issue 251 by ken...@google.com: Suggestion for performance  
improvement with Python

http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=251

If this is actually faster than the current code and produces the same  
results then we'd certainly like to use it.  You'll need to sign the  
Contributor License Agreement, though, to give us the right to use your  
code:


http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html -- If you own  
copyright on this contribution (you can sign this trivially via the web  
form at the bottom of the page)
http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html -- If your employer  
does (unfortunately requires physical signature).


Let me know if/when you've signed.  Thanks.

As for the C-extension implementation, please do report a bug if it doesn't  
work for you.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol 
Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.



[protobuf] Re: Issue 251 in protobuf: Suggestion for performance improvement with Python

2011-01-13 Thread protobuf


Comment #1 on issue 251 by kleptog: Suggestion for performance improvement  
with Python

http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=251

Note: I can imagine you want to ignore this issue as too ugly to live,  
but I figured at least posting it may help other people.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol 
Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.