Comment #2 on issue 251 by ken...@google.com: Suggestion for performance
improvement with Python
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=251
If this is actually faster than the current code and produces the same
results then we'd certainly like to use it. You'll need to sign the
Contributor License Agreement, though, to give us the right to use your
code:
http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html -- If you own
copyright on this contribution (you can sign this trivially via the web
form at the bottom of the page)
http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html -- If your employer
does (unfortunately requires physical signature).
Let me know if/when you've signed. Thanks.
As for the C-extension implementation, please do report a bug if it doesn't
work for you.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.