On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:39 PM, elodg gye...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Feng. One more thing: lite_runtime is not supported in proto3
alpha 1. Is it going to stay this way?
The first proto3 release (official 3.0) will not have lite runtime support.
We plan to add it after the first release.
Thanks, Feng. One more thing: lite_runtime is not supported in proto3 alpha
1. Is it going to stay this way? Is the runtime for proto3 going to be
smaller than for proto2, thus no need for lite?
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 11:50:41 PM UTC+3, Feng Xiao wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:54
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:54 PM, elodg gye...@gmail.com wrote:
I provide pure virtual interfaces and abstract default implementations in
header-only source code specifically to allow for different compilers and
compiler settings. It seems to me that I either have to provide pb.cc and
the
I provide pure virtual interfaces and abstract default implementations in
header-only source code specifically to allow for different compilers and
compiler settings. It seems to me that I either have to provide pb.cc and
the protobuf lib source, or just .protos and let developers download,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:04 AM, elodg gye...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose there is a plug-in framework that uses protobuf to pass data
around between plug-ins. The plug-ins can be C++ dynamic libraries, where
the proto wire crosses the ABI boundary going around binary
incompatibilities. Many
