I've implemented code generator so others can test / use our C
implementation in Python.
Another new thing is Lazy decoding support. Message are decoded on the fly
as attributes are accessed for the first time.
More info:
http://blog.connex.io/introducing-cypb-improving-the-performance-of
You
On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:36 , Atamurad Hezretkuliyev wrote:
Currently our basic deserializer module is 17x faster than Google's
implementation in pure Python.
The pure python code is pretty slow. However, the repository version
(and the newly released 2.4.0 rc 1?) has C++ code to do
Following Evan's advice, I've run experiment using the repository version.
According to my test, Google's C++ parser code is 7.6 times faster than pure
python, which is consistent with Yang's results.
Our C decoder is twice faster than google's c++ extension.
I've pushed the updated code and
Hey there,
We at connex.io use Protocol Buffers quite heavily, 1) as client-server
communication protocol, and 2) to store objects in our key-value database.
When processing requests server-side by the Python application, I've
discovered that ~30% of CPU usage goes to deserializing PB messages.
