Comment #8 on issue 120 by ken...@google.com: Request to allow extending
CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=120
It's true that because Coded*Stream are public, we cannot contract these
interfaces. However, we *do* currently have the
Updates:
Owner: ken...@google.com
Comment #6 on issue 120 by ken...@google.com: Request to allow extending
CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=120
The problem with this is that if we ever modify the API of Coded*Stream
(e.g. to
Comment #7 on issue 120 by owen.oma...@gmail.com: Request to allow
extending CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=120
I understand about not wanting to get locked into an API, although I'm sure
you'll already find that if you change the
Comment #4 on issue 120 by owen.oma...@gmail.com: Request to allow
extending CodedInputStream and CodeOutputStream
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=120
I'd like to make an alternative encoding that has additional properties.
With the final set on the
