Comment #4 on issue 485 by xiaof...@google.com: ByteString should be
Serializable
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=485
Hi fizbin,
Thanks for providing the patch.
Can you submit the patch to our new github site:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/pulls
and sign this Googl
Comment #3 on issue 485 by vi...@umich.edu: ByteString should be
Serializable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=485
Alongside serialization...
The internal usage of RopeByteString (and RopeInputStream) is particularly
interesting. It would be very handy if ByteString expose
Comment #2 on issue 485 by fiz...@gmail.com: ByteString should be
Serializable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=485
Obviously in the patch I meant the exception text to read "not to be
serialized" instead of the nonsensical "not to serialized".
--
You received this messa
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Patch
Comment #1 on issue 485 by xiaof...@google.com: ByteString should be
Serializable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=485
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Y