Re: [protobuf] Distributing protobuf library and protos in a plug-in framework

2015-04-29 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:39 PM, elodg gye...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Feng. One more thing: lite_runtime is not supported in proto3 alpha 1. Is it going to stay this way? The first proto3 release (official 3.0) will not have lite runtime support. We plan to add it after the first release.

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-04-29 Thread Nikolay Mladenov
I am also evaluating proto2 vs proto3 and even though it seems proto3 should be the way to go I really miss the has_** functionality in proto3. It seems the following proto pattern may be a workaround: message M{ oneof optional_value{ int32 value = 1; } } It does generate value(),

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-04-29 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Nikolay Mladenov nikolay.mlade...@gmail.com wrote: I am also evaluating proto2 vs proto3 and even though it seems proto3 should be the way to go I really miss the has_** functionality in proto3. It seems the following proto pattern may be a workaround: