On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:13:12PM -0800, Shardul Deo wrote:
> Let me know if you have any questions (or if there is something better
> that I can use instead),
Why You have not considered taking one of existing wire format
specifications [1, 2, 3]? Having field of service description is nice
but
Pavel,
I didn't want to have my code depend on anything else other than the core
protobuf library which is why I wrote my own wire spec.
I could remove service from my request format or add it to [1], but that
would still not make them compatible since the response format would still
be different.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:35:17PM -0800, Shardul Deo wrote:
> Pavel,
> I didn't want to have my code depend on anything else other than the core
> protobuf library which is why I wrote my own wire spec.
> I could remove service from my request format or add it to [1], but that
> would still not m
