Hello Kenton,
Thanks for your reply. I actually read that text earlier, but didn't
get what you're saying from that text (still don't), probably because
it's kind of abstract. My guess is that you're talking about this:
If any of your elements are optional, the encoded message may or may
not
Hi all!
I'm trying to use protobuf in my project (photoshop plug-in), and encountered a
problem:
my DLL module is loaded/unloaded by host (many times).
source code generated by protoc contains many
XXX_descriptor_, XXX_reflection_, XXX::default_instance_ pointers
and no function for cleanup
You may be right, but we've done it that way for many years, and it would be
too hard to change now.
Are there any known STL implementations that use simple null-terminated
strings? string::size() would have to be O(n) for them, which would be
unfortunate.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:30 AM, marc
Hi Ivan,
I'm pretty torn by this, because there are some people who absolutely insist
that globals should not be cleaned up at shutdown, because it could cause
still-running background threads that are using those objects to crash.
I've argued that those threads should be cleaned up before
On Feb 25, 2:41 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
You may be right, but we've done it that way for many years, and it would be
too hard to change now.
Are there any known STL implementations that use simple null-terminated
strings? string::size() would have to be O(n) for them,
Good to know, thanks.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:41 PM, marc vaill...@cis.jhu.edu wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:41 pm, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
You may be right, but we've done it that way for many years, and it would
be
too hard to change now.
Are there any known STL
Kenton,
The generated code for a string field has setters for std::string and
const char *, but do you think you could add a (const char *, int
length) setter as well (like you have for bytes fields)? Right now in
protobuf-perlxs, we have to construct a temporary std::string in order
to set a
Sure. Actually, someone made that change to the internal code just the
other day, so it'll be in SVN soon. You can also do:
message.mutable_foo()-assign(data, size);
which is equivalent to:
message.set_foo(string(data, size))
but avoids the temporary string.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:53
