Want to make $200+ Daily on net fast?

Tired of home jobs that not work fast?Then this for you, the home job that has been recorded make money . Proven method go here: http://processemailonline.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol

Re: SIGBUS alignment issue with ZeroCopyStreams on Solaris/Sparc

Hi Monty, Can you test the attached patch and verify that it fixes the problem? (Kind of hard to test here because we only have x86 machines which happily execute unaligned reads.) On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I just filed an issue: > > http://code.goog

Re: SIGBUS alignment issue with ZeroCopyStreams on Solaris/Sparc

Kenton Varda wrote: > Hi Monty, > > Can you test the attached patch and verify that it fixes the problem? > (Kind of hard to test here because we only have x86 machines which > happily execute unaligned reads.) Absolutely! > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Monty Taylor

Protocol Buffers for Python 3.1

Hi all, Our application has an embedded python 3.1 interpreter and we would really like to use protocol buffers. I have started to make the protocol buffers python 3 compatible but I am running into issues with starting up the module. I create a very simple proto definition in a file Example.pr

Re: 2.2.0 "make check" failures on Solaris 10 sparc32 (problems with zlib?)

Kenton Varda wrote: > I expanded on your patch a bit. Can you take a look? > > http://codereview.appspot.com/117047 I tried the updated patch on my system that has an old zlib, and it appears to work correctly (zlib support is disabled) -O --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

Re: 2.2.0 "make check" failures on Solaris 10 sparc32 (problems with zlib?)

Can you review the diff, too? At Google we have a policy of reviewing all changes. Just tell me if it looks OK to you, or if there's anything you'd recommend changing (probably not since it's quite short). On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote: > Kenton Varda wrote: > > I expande

Re: Protocol Buffers for Python 3.1

Does Python 3.x implement metaclasses the same way? It looks to me like the metaclass may not be getting applied. On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:21 PM, cjimison wrote: > > Hi all, > > Our application has an embedded python 3.1 interpreter and we would > really like to use protocol buffers. I have s

Re: 2.2.0 "make check" failures on Solaris 10 sparc32 (problems with zlib?)

Kenton Varda wrote: > Can you review the diff, too? At Google we have a policy of reviewing > all changes. Just tell me if it looks OK to you, or if there's anything > you'd recommend changing (probably not since it's quite short). I looked at the diff and it seemed ok, but I'm no autoconf expe

Re: Protocol Buffers for Python 3.1

Kenton Varda wrote: > Does Python 3.x implement metaclasses the same way? It looks to me like > the metaclass may not be getting applied. AIUI, setuptools (and therefore pkg_resources) have not yet been ported to python3 yet. I believe there are discussions about including pkg_resources directly