Thanks. That worked me.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Add this to your .proto file:
>
> option java_multiple_files = true;
>
> Note that the outer class is still generated, it just doesn't contain the
> other classes. You can still change the outer class name with:
>
Hello,
For example if I have a repeated int32 field that currently contains 10
elements, and I want to modify the field to only contain 3 elements.
Is there a way to achieve this using the methods of the Reflection
class, or do I have to first ClearField, and then call AddInt32 three
times ?
On 11/10/2009 11:04 AM, Romain François wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> For example if I have a repeated int32 field that currently contains 10
> elements, and I want to modify the field to only contain 3 elements.
>
> Is there a way to achieve this using the methods of the Reflection
> class, or do I have
Hi,
Is there a facility in protobuf library to retrieve data if the field
numbers and wire types are known? If so how to go about this?
Regards,
Rahul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffer
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:25 , rahul prasad wrote:
> Is there a facility in protobuf library to retrieve data if the
> field numbers and wire types are known? If so how to go about this?
If you don't want to use the generated code that handles this for you
for some reason, you want to look at Cod
Hi,
May i ask whats the difference between these two protobuf implementations?
com.google.common.io.protocol.ProtoBuf.java
com.google.protobuf package classes
and when to use which?
Regards,
Rahul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Visionweb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a programm test that I can't compile under Debian, with g++.
> The same programm is runing with my Ubuntu, and eclipse. Now, I try to
> compile it under Debian, with g++ (command line). But I have this
> error:
>
> g++ -o udp_client udp_client.cpp
> /tmp/ccaU
Hello,
I have a programm test that I can't compile under Debian, with g++.
The same programm is runing with my Ubuntu, and eclipse. Now, I try to
compile it under Debian, with g++ (command line). But I have this
error:
g++ -o udp_client udp_client.cpp
/tmp/ccaUFigk.o: In function `main':
udp_cli
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:28 AM, rahul prasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> May i ask whats the difference between these two protobuf implementations?
>
> com.google.common.io.protocol.ProtoBuf.java
>
I've never heard of this. Where does it come from?
> com.google.protobuf package classes
>
This is the o
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:25 AM, rahul prasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a facility in protobuf library to retrieve data if the field
> numbers and wire types are known?
>
Write a .proto file with that information. Then you can compile it, or you
can use protoc's --decode flag.
If you need some
How do I represent java.util.Date in my .proto definition? Is this
supported, or any other workaround for doing this?
Regards,
Rahul Prasad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To
So, If I am developing for Android, should I use this protobuf library
instead of the standard implementation present at com.google.protobuf? Will
I encounter any problems mid way due to this switch? Any feedback would be
greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Rahul
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Henne
You'd have to ask the Android people, as they are the owners of this
alternate implementation. IIRC, they have not released the code generator
program to go with it, so you probably won't be able to use it.
The official protobuf implementation in "lite mode" should work great on
Android -- this i
I am in a situation, where the .proto files are not present for the Protocol
Buffers used in the application I am working on. Since the .proto files need
to be created, I was wondering if the following yellow highlighted numbers
should correspond to the same fields they stood for in the actual .pro
Yes, the tag numbers have to be the same.
If you have code that was generated from the original .proto file, look
inside it for comments that look like proto field definitions -- they should
include the tag number. Otherwise you're out of luck.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:00 PM, rahul prasad wrot
I use a dateFormatter to send it as a string. I suppose its also
possible to send it as a int64 if you want. Just be wary of
timezones.
Dan
On Nov 10, 3:25 pm, rahul prasad wrote:
> How do I represent java.util.Date in my .proto definition? Is this
> supported, or any other workaround for doi
Yes! That works, thanks.
On Nov 9, 8:37 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> You want: com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.FileDescriptor.buildFrom()
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Dan wrote:
>
> > Im trying to write the following client/server exchange using the Java
> > Protobuf API:
>
> > 1) Cl
Hi,
I am the fellow that has been dealing with this problem on Snow
Leopard.
I am left scratching my head as to the cause.
I installed VMware in Snow Leopard and loaded Snow Leopard Server onto
VMware (not possible to install regular Snow Leopard on it).
I wanted to experiment with a clean syste
18 matches
Mail list logo
