[protobuf] Re: Issue 4 in protobuf: Case-Sensitive parsing can lead to uncompilable output files

Comment #8 on issue 4 by noam.koren1: Case-Sensitive parsing can lead to uncompilable output files http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=4 jhdfiweshfkesj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group,

[protobuf] Issue 187 in protobuf: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option

Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 187 by dima: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187 The project I'm working has C++ and Java code that need to share a few .proto

[protobuf] Re: Issue 187 in protobuf: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option

Comment #1 on issue 187 by dima: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187 Actually, the patch is wrong... It overrides optimize_for if it's set in .proto files, but does not override the default value. -- You

[protobuf] Re: Issue 187 in protobuf: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option

Comment #2 on issue 187 by n...@chromium.org: Command-line argument to override the optimize_for option http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187 Would it be much more difficult to support arbitrary option overrides on the command line? -- You received this message because