Even with the extra call to access the offset, I would think there would be
some advantage to not making the data copies, which generate garbage cruft.
Am interested in your patch whenever it surfaces.
I seem to remember you saying that using an Encoder/Decoder didn't pay off
when the number of
On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:29 , David Dabbs wrote:
Even with the extra call to access the offset, I would think there
would be some advantage to not making the data copies, which
generate garbage cruft.
However, the way I am doing it doesn't generate any garbage: I keep a
temporary char[]
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 193 by j.boand: need help for Protobuf
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=193
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Please use labels and text
I'm using a protobuf as the protocol for a distributed system.But now
I
have some questions about protobuf
a.Whether protobuf provides the inteface for user-defined allocator
because sometimes I find 'malloc' cost too much? I've tried TCmalloc,
but I think I can optimize the memory allocation
hello,
i'm trying to make use of the compiler plugin infrastructure that was
released with 2.3.0.
using the c++ api to access the elements in a *.proto file seems
straight forward and i got a small example working.
but i have trouble to use the insertion points correctly.
can anybody provide a
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 193 by jas...@google.com: need help for Protobuf
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=193
You need to provide more information about the problems you are having. To
start with,
send your question to protobuf@googlegroups.com -
Can you provide more details? What commands are you running, and what are
your errors? In your previous thread it sounded like you were using C++, but
now you mention Java - which language are you trying to use? Also, are you
attempting to use the lite library or the full library? It seems most
Updates:
Status: NeedPatchFromUser
Owner: ---
Comment #1 on issue 192 by jas...@google.com: C++0x conformance issue:
using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=192
We haven't started compiling with c++0x yet, can
Comment #2 on issue 192 by vdolya: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved
keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=192
Yes. It's in attached file.
Attachments:
nullptr_reserved.patch 1.4 KB
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: ---
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
Comment #1 on issue 191 by jas...@google.com: I suggest a DebugXmlString
interface to the Message class
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=191
XML output can be implemented on
Yes, some of the tests are explicitly testing error cases, which causes
error messages to be logged. If they say they passed in the end, then they
passed.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Vitalii Dolia vdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When running protobuf tests I'm getting bunch of errors
11 matches
Mail list logo