Comment #2 on issue 214 by eugene.vigdorchik: Incorrect generic type
parameters in java runtime
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=214
Sure. Will do it next week when I get home.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers
Eugene,
I am in the exploration process of using Protobuf's with a project.
For my level integration I took all the Java Google code and created a
Plug-in Project in Eclipse RCP. Then using the export feature (OSGi)
I reference the necessary code. I think you might be integrating the
Protobuf
If you want to serialize them as one message, make your definition do
exactly that:
message CombinedTypes {
optional int32 int32_val = 1;
optional double double_val = 2;
optional float float_val = 3;
}
Note that you can make the code generator produce effectively the same code
you describe
I added this to the ThirdPartyAddOns wiki as well. Thanks for contributing
to the protobuf community!
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Eugene Vigdorchik
eugene.vigdorc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the birth of scala-protobuf project. You can
find the sources at
It could be made an option. Something like...
message MyMessage {
enum Foo {
option cpp_namespace = true;
FIRST = 0;
...
}
...
}
...and then could be made the default if there is ever a Proto3.
But, even if this is just ends up on some if-there-ever-is-a-Proto3
