[protobuf] Re: Built a simplified XPath-like syntax for Protocol Buffers

Pavel, Just curious, is your code licensed under the New BSD license like Protocol Buffers is? My employer's lawyers are very particular about licensing when it comes to what I can use or contribute to for use in a product. --Greg Adair On Sep 16, 10:19 pm, Pavel Shramov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1

[protobuf] Issue 219 in protobuf: MTOM with Protocol Buffers

Status: New Owner: ken...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 219 by zoran.rajic: MTOM with Protocol Buffers http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=219 I was wondering if you guys plan to implement the SOAP/MTOM and XML+XOP -like extension on top of PB's. I c

[protobuf] Re: Issue 219 in protobuf: MTOM with Protocol Buffers

Updates: Status: OutOfScope Comment #1 on issue 219 by temporal: MTOM with Protocol Buffers http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=219 This could easily be implemented as a library on top of protocol buffers. However, we have no plans to add such functionality to the offic