Comment #31 on issue 188 by xarthisius.kk: protobuf fails to link after
compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=188
For comparison, the Free Software Foundation has...
I've contributed to several FSF projects in
This is C++.
I had not tried optimizing for CODE_SIZE. I understood that CODE_SIZE
was the precursor to and not as compact as LITE_RUNTIME.
Yes, I believe they are tag numbers, the enumeration-style numbering
of each possible response or request.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #32 on issue 188 by ken...@google.com: protobuf fails to link after
compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=188
It looks like our CLA form may in fact be broken. :( I'll try to get it
fixed.
I'm as
Hmm, you might want to consider parsing both messages into DynamicMessages
(or into the generated message classes if you have them compiled in) and
then using a protobuf-reflection-based algorithm (not to be confused with
Java reflection; see Message#getField()). Your current code is very much
There are problems with this:
1) Boxing and unboxing primitives is relatively expensive, compared to just
passing them as primitives. If performance matters to you at all (and for
many protobuf users, it does), you probably don't want this.
2) If you accept messages from untrusted sources, your
I've never seen this error. It doesn't make much sense -- protobuf
generated code should not contain any imports. Are you modifying the
generated code in some way?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Xiao Ling bardm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have a generated protobuf java file which
Comment #33 on issue 188 by ken...@google.com: protobuf fails to link after
compiling with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed because of missing -lpthread
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=188
The issue should be fixed now. Sounds like it's too late, though. :(
--
You received this
You're right. There is no imports in the code. The message was printed
out by maven. As said, the file compiles ok by its own.
Here is the situation:
I have both scala and java code in my project. As long as there is
some scala code calls the protobuf code (which is in java), the
You can only have one CodedInputStream wrapping a ZeroCopyInputStream at a
time, otherwise they will confuse each other with buffering conflicts.
CodedInputStreams are cheap to construct, so you can just make one on the
stack in a block, like:
{
CodedInputStream
Sorry, I don't know how the scala plugin works. It sounds like it has a
bug. Perhaps it generates its own code based on the Java code, and somehow
that code ends up broken given this particular input...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Xiao Ling bardm...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right. There
I agree. I'm going to ask the maven-scala-plugin guys then.
Thanks,
--Xiao
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Sorry, I don't know how the scala plugin works. It sounds like it has a
bug. Perhaps it generates its own code based on the Java code, and
11 matches
Mail list logo
