Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 541 by matt.k...@undue.org: Double decode in
google.protobuf.text_format._CUnescape
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=541
What steps will reproduce the problem?
print
Hi,
I'm looking for a toll which will generate MySQL/SQLite schemas from .proto
files.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18082871/im-looking-for-a-tool-which-processes-proto-files-into-mysql-sqlite-schemas
Thanks,
Chris.
On 6 August 2013 13:42, protobuf@googlegroups.com wrote:
Today's
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:31 PM, V.B. vidalborro...@gmail.com wrote:
... Actually, I just now took a closer look at the readChunk() method.
Even that method makes an internal copy, so it looks like readChunk() isn't
what we are looking for after all. Hmmm.
It seems to me that readChunk() has
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 541 by xiaof...@google.com: Double decode in
google.protobuf.text_format._CUnescape
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=541
I think this is fixed in trunk. The current implementation of re.sub() will
only do the unescaping
Other recipients:
My project has a C# app on Windows, as well as a Node.js process on Linux.
I want to set up a bi-directional commmunication framework between them.
I wonder if protobuf supports this and what resource I can use.
Thanks a lot!
--
You received this message because you are
My project has a C# app on Windows, as well as a Node.js process on Linux.
I want to set up a bi-directional commmunication framework between them.
I wonder if protobuf supports this and what resource I can use.
Thanks a lot!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I am new to protobuf, encontering a similar problem.
I want to set up a bidirectional communication framework between Node.js
process on Linux and C# process on Windows.
I wonder if it possible and what resource I can use.
Thanks!
On Friday, July 15, 2011 12:10:26 AM UTC+8, msdark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Feng Xiao xiaof...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:31 PM, V.B. vidalborro...@gmail.com wrote:
... Actually, I just now took a closer look at the readChunk() method.
Even that method makes an internal copy, so it looks like readChunk() isn't
what we
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Oliver Jowett oliver.jow...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Feng Xiao xiaof...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:31 PM, V.B. vidalborro...@gmail.com wrote:
... Actually, I just now took a closer look at the readChunk() method.
Even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Wouldn’t it be even smaller to do this
message Packet {
repeated uint32 pids = 1 [packed=true];
repeated string execnames = 2;
}
working under the assumption that the two repeated fields will be the
same length? You will burn two
10 matches
Mail list logo
