On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:54 PM, elodg wrote:
> I provide pure virtual interfaces and abstract default implementations in
> header-only source code specifically to allow for different compilers and
> compiler settings. It seems to me that I either have to provide pb.cc and
> the protobuf lib sou
Hi Han-Wen,
I could really use it.
On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 10:15:47 PM UTC+4:30, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have a bare-bones BUILD file for building protobuf with Bazel. Is this
> something you guys are interested in?
>
--
You received this message because you are subs
Hi, everybody.
I'm working on test project while learning protobuf and I've faced a
problem when I wanted to use one of the google proto files.
In such case I have to import them manually, so I need to copy them to my
project or compile my project with additional proto_path option.
I've chosen
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Mikhail Melnik
wrote:
> Hi, everybody.
>
> I'm working on test project while learning protobuf and I've faced a
> problem when I wanted to use one of the google proto files.
> In such case I have to import them manually, so I need to copy them to my
> project or c
Thanks, Feng. One more thing: lite_runtime is not supported in proto3 alpha
1. Is it going to stay this way? Is the runtime for proto3 going to be
smaller than for proto2, thus no need for lite?
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 11:50:41 PM UTC+3, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:
