[protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2014-12-17 Thread Arjun Satish
! Looking forward to the 3.0 release! Best, Arjun Satish On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:51:01 PM UTC-8, Feng Xiao wrote: Hi all, I just published protobuf v3.0.0-alpha-1 on our github site: https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.0.0-alpha-1 This is the first alpha release

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-12 Thread Arjun Satish
... On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 18:52 Arjun Satish arjun.sat...@gmail.com wrote: Did anyone get a chance to look at this request? On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:54:12 PM UTC-8, Arjun Satish wrote: Hey guys, Thanks for all the hard work! I have a question regarding the decision to drop support

[protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-07 Thread Arjun Satish
Did anyone get a chance to look at this request? On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:54:12 PM UTC-8, Arjun Satish wrote: Hey guys, Thanks for all the hard work! I have a question regarding the decision to drop support for default values. Fields which are set to their default values

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread Arjun Satish
). This does not let me use other proto 3 features if my proto definition file contain default values. Thanks for your timely responses! Highly appreciate it! On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Feng Xiao xiaof...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Arjun Satish arjun.sat...@gmail.com

Re: [protobuf] Re: Protobuf Buffers v3.0.0-alpha-1

2015-01-13 Thread Arjun Satish
wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Arjun Satish arjun.sat...@gmail.com wrote: Feng, What do you mean when you say In C++/Java/Python where we support both proto2 and proto3, default values will continue to exist? What I meant is that you can still find its traces in the implementation