Thanks a lot for the reply. I understood that part. Currently in the .proto
file, there is a string definition which gets translated to std::string.
What we actually need is a typedef which can be configured as per the end
user wish, before building the protobuf. But can i get some assistance on
ho
ease - have any ideas?
>>
>> (This does seem a little dangerous: if people are shipping around dynamic
>> libraries compiled with different string implementations, this would be
>> problematic. This is similar to the issues people have had with different
>> STL implemen