FWIW, I played around with various other versions of this function, using a
comparison tree similar to the C++ code and such but nothing beat your
simpled unrolled loop in python 2.x. Calling dis.dis() on each function to
see the python byte code disassembly is revealing.
side note:
err, please ignore this section of my message:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Gregory P. Smith g...@google.com wrote:
Please submit patches for enhancements in the issue tracker. For some
reason its not accepting bugs.
BTW, for further potential optimization try a less linear search
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:05 AM, maxw mwindi...@videotron.ca wrote:
As far as I can tell, the python protocol buffer code is not yet
compatible with python 3.x. I found a few messages in this discussion
forum indicating that some people had worked on this, but I saw no
pointer to actual code.
, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:05 AM, maxw mwindi...@videotron.ca wrote:
As far as I can tell, the python protocol buffer code is not yet
compatible with python 3.x. I found a few messages in this discussion
forum indicating that some people had worked on this, but I saw
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Gustavo Temple gustavo.temp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Has anyone considered the porting Protobuf to the PPC64 architecture?
It should already work without any changes.
-gps
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol
