Re: Thoughts on a cleaner Java protocol buffer compiler.

[Jim Sermersheim]

To give credit to the protobuf dev team, I wasn't all WTF. I'm an old guy so I was all F'n A! Kenton Varda wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:14 PM, burtonator <burtona...@gmail.com> wrote:   My thinking on the current format is that Java developers are going to look at this and be all WTF and then walk away.......  maybe it's just me ;) That's not the reaction I've seen from most Java devs. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- -- Jim Sermersheim Senior Software Engineer, Applications Development m: 801.380.8760 l: 801.424.5511 f: 801.293.3054 e: jsermersh...@fusionio.com 6350 S. 3000 E, 6th floor Salt Lake City, UT 84121 www.fusionio.com CONFIDENTIAL This document and attachments contain information from Fusion-io, Inc. which is confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this emailed information is strictly prohibited, and that the documents should be returned to Fusion-io, Inc. immediately. In this regard, if you have received this email in error, please notify us by return email immediately.