If I understand correctly there is no good way to use proto buffers to
stream different types of messages, right? For example if my stream
has a mix of several messages of type m1 and m2, I will have to device
a scheme outside of proto buffers to separate it into 2 streams and
then pass it through
Thanks. Also how do I know the type of the message? One way would be
to check all optional fields (each represent a different type of
message) of the wrapper message and then pick the one which is not
null. Is that the only way?
On Mar 27, 12:08 pm, Dave Bailey wrote:
> Kenton,
>
> I don't suppo
I have an application that is reading data from disk and is using
proto buffers to create java objects. When doing performance analysis
I was surprised to find out that most of the time was spent in and
around proto buffers and not reading data from disk.
On profiling further (using yourkit) I fou
until it is needed. For example for comparisons I
should just be able to use the bytes. Also do you think that if I
encode/decode using utf-16 it would be faster? Clearly it is not as
compressed.
On Aug 22, 11:58 am, Evan Jones wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:45 , achintms wrote:
>
> &g
