As you can see the 28th field has a bit mask setup in the generated code:
// optional int32 StateSequence = 28;
inline bool Order::has_statesequence() const {
  return (_has_bits_[0] & 0x88000000u) != 0;
}
inline void Order::set_has_statesequence() {
  _has_bits_[0] |= 0x88000000u;
}
inline void Order::clear_has_statesequence() {
  _has_bits_[0] &= ~0x88000000u;
}

The 29th field does not:
// optional .OXObjects.OrderStates OrderState = 29;
inline bool Order::has_orderstate() const {
  return (_has_bits_[0] & 0x00000000u) != 0;
}
inline void Order::set_has_orderstate() {
  _has_bits_[0] |= 0x00000000u;
}
inline void Order::clear_has_orderstate() {
  _has_bits_[0] &= ~0x00000000u;
}

Anyone have a fix for this in the protoc.exe code generator?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/WXf9PyIg6xQJ.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to