On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Giri Guntipalli
wrote:
> I am also facing similar issue but problem seems to happen only when
> library is complied with -O2 or –Os(optimize for size) with gcc tool chain.
>
>
>
> looks like extensions are being treated as dead code and removed by gcc
> optimizat
I am also facing similar issue but problem seems to happen only when
library is complied with -O2 or –Os(optimize for size) with gcc tool chain.
looks like extensions are being treated as dead code and removed by gcc
optimization, any thoughts on overcoming this problem.
Thank you
Gir
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, the extension defined in tha same .proto file.
fd = x->GetReflection()->FindKnownExtensionByName("bar"); this is
returning fd as NULL.
foo.SetExtension(bar, xyzValue); and foo.AddExtension(bar, xyzValue); are
possible when we invoke on foo variable.
But why sa
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Channakeshava S C <
channakeshava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am facing problem in getting protobuf Message with extension from JSON
> string {"xyz": [1234,2345,3456],"extensions":{"bar": [1,11,111]}} which is
> generated from Foo.
>
> message Foo {
> repeated int32
I am facing problem in getting protobuf Message with extension from JSON
string {"xyz": [1234,2345,3456],"extensions":{"bar": [1,11,111]}} which is
generated from Foo.
message Foo {
repeated int32 xyz = 11;
extensions 100 to 199;
}
extend Foo {
repeated int32 bar = 123;
}
The word "ext
