Re: [protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-03-03 Thread Adewale Oshineye
On 28 February 2010 18:09, Henner Zeller henner.zel...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
 which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
 different on-disk and on-the-wire representations?

 Looks like they fell into the trap of wanting to provide
 self-description (with a pretty high overhead per message) and, worse,
 message inheritance.

 -h
They're just put out a more sophisticated explanation of their
project's existence:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/KirksRants/~3/8IRgSRLTNMs/whence-fudge-why-not-just-useextend.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.



[protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-02-28 Thread Adewale Oshineye
Hi all,
Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
different on-disk and on-the-wire representations?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.



Re: [protobuf] Fudge proto project

2010-02-28 Thread Henner Zeller
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 09:13, Adewale Oshineye adew...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,
 Have you seen this: http://www.fudgemsg.org/display/FDG/Fudge+Proto
 which claims to be compatible with the syntax of protobufs but use
 different on-disk and on-the-wire representations?

Looks like they fell into the trap of wanting to provide
self-description (with a pretty high overhead per message) and, worse,
message inheritance.

-h

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.