Yes, you can. What is your target language? The accessor names are generated
differently - in C++ you would get lower-cased names. Have you looked at the
generated header? You may also want to see
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/style.html
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Jacques
Hi,
Given the .proto file as below:
message NestedObject {
required string field = 1;
}
message OuterObject {
required NestedObject nestedObject = 1;
}
Question: Can one define the nested object within the OuterObject as
required?
If you can use required, what will the getters/set
