Re: [protobuf] Re: Compatibility Issue + Max value for the indices/field numbers + are high field number slower?

2016-06-20 Thread a_teammate
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016 00:56:18 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ong: > > > Separate embedded messages would involve switches for the code > generation (official build vs modded build) but could be doable, and maybe > it is even a bit cleaner. > > The CRC thing would have meant an uniform solution,

Re: [protobuf] Re: Compatibility Issue + Max value for the indices/field numbers + are high field number slower?

2016-06-20 Thread Jeremy Ong
> Separate embedded messages would involve switches for the code generation (official build vs modded build) but could be doable, and maybe it is even a bit cleaner. > The CRC thing would have meant an uniform solution, but maybe namespacing the modded messages isn't the worst idea. I'd be really

[protobuf] Re: Compatibility Issue + Max value for the indices/field numbers + are high field number slower?

2016-06-20 Thread a_teammate
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2016 20:50:17 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ong: > https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/encoding#structure > > Protobuf messages are associative arrays of key value pairs, where the key > is a union of the field number encoded as a varint and the value wire type >