Comment #32 on issue 298 by cvgav...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
could someone tell me when 2.5.0 will be released ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #33 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
You can find 2.5.0rc1 tarballs in the download page.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #34 on issue 298 by cvgav...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
thanks. the problem is that I need it in the maven repo to convince Drools
team to upgrade to the new version.
--
You received this
Comment #31 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: which version will contain this fix ? It will be included in the next
release 2.5.0
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #29 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Patch submitted to trunk. Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #28 on issue 298 by m...@thebishops.org: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I looked of the code review. Looks good. The Export-Package instruction
is unnecessary but does no harmgiven the classes are all in
Comment #27 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Hi all,
I have prepared a change for code review. Please help review it at:
https://codereview.appspot.com/6745056/
If there are
Comment #17 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container. All
Comment #18 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
it doesn't seem right to me that we should change protobuf to make it
conform to the specification of a certain container. -- In
Comment #19 on issue 298 by cvgav...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I would like to use protobuf (in its latest version) in my equinox project
too... Today I had to use a old version that was wrapped by
Comment #20 on issue 298 by m...@thebishops.org: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Protobuf is about enabling optimal data transfer between devices and
servers. OSGi is about java software on mobile devices as well
Comment #21 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
I have no idea of how widely OSGi is used in the open source community. Is
it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java
Comment #22 on issue 298 by matteo.c...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
This is the best way to add suport in my opinion since the manifest file
gets generated and there's no room for mistakes there -
Comment #23 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Re: Is it the suggested way to add OSGi meta data to every Java jar? Yes.
Increased modularity is Java's future, and OSGi is the
Comment #24 on issue 298 by xiaof...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
OK, I'll patch the change suggested in comment #7 to the trunk soon. Thanks
for your info.
--
You received this message because you
Comment #25 on issue 298 by debroux@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
It could be good to have two different artifacts for the full-blown version
and the significantly smaller and leaner lite
Comment #26 on issue 298 by rocketra...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
If you have a lite and full jar, from an OSGi perspective, it is better
*not* to distinguish the package exports i.e. for the
Comment #13 on issue 298 by m...@thebishops.org: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Any status on this issue?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group.
To
Comment #11 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's
manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Woops - better - updated plugin version for osgi generation.
Attachments:
osgi.patch 3.3 KB
--
You received this message
Comment #12 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's
manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Crp. Fixed typo in project url.
Attachments:
osgi.patch 3.3 KB
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #9 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Here's a patch to the pom, adapted from Guice's info, that doesn't require
a packaging type change, and includes appropriate
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 298 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #8 on issue 298 by cjdo...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
The advantage of comment #7's approach is that OSGi vs. Maven version
number syntax is automatically handled by the plugin. I strongly
Comment #7 on issue 298 by thomas.k...@googlemail.com: protobuf jar's
manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
To create an OSGI bundle apply the following changes to the pom.xml:
(Line 14):
packagingbundle/packaging
instead of
Comment #6 on issue 298 by compuwar...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
As a check against what other are doing... we use the following data in
meta-inf
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Bundle-ManifestVersion: 2
Comment #2 on issue 298 by neverov@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Ok. I'll try to look into it later this week (probably over the weekend).
First, I'll try to identify what exactly this metadata
Comment #3 on issue 298 by neverov@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Couldn't hold myself from looking into this :) Please find the first
version of the patch attached (sorry if it's not in accepted
Comment #4 on issue 298 by sam.hend...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
My team has been creating and using snapshot bundles in karaf/Felix OSGi
containers for a few months so I don't think it's a hard
Updates:
Status: NeedPatchFromUser
Comment #1 on issue 298 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Hmm, I'm not familiar with OSGi. Would you please provide a patch for this?
--
You received
29 matches
Mail list logo