thanks
On Jan 18, 11:39 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Yep, that's the best thing to do right now.
>
> We're thinking of introducing a separate "Parser" interface, which would
> allow you to do:
>
> message = prototype.getParserForType().parse(data);
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:34 AM, koert wrote
thanks
On Jan 18, 11:39 pm, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Yep, that's the best thing to do right now.
>
> We're thinking of introducing a separate "Parser" interface, which would
> allow you to do:
>
> message = prototype.getParserForType().parse(data);
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:34 AM, koert wrote