I agree that making a Contract have an int specifying the ContractGroup id
looks preferable. If it's very difficult to generate a unique id for each
ContractGroup, you could consider using a fingerprint of the string -- of
course there's the risk of collisions, but with 64-bit fingerprints that
ri
On 19 tammi, 20:31, Kenton Varda wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand. I think you are using the word "group" to mean
> something different than what it means in the .proto language. At least, I
> hope so, because the "group" in the .proto language is deprecated.
Yes, I've got a domain model cont
