On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:58 PM, ch...@ochsnet.com wrote:
Always having to obtain a new instance of a repeated nested message from
it's parent is really cumbersome.I fail to see the logic behind it
being that singular message fields have set_allocated.
We can add an add_allocated() method
On Friday, October 3, 2014 10:51:09 AM UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:58 PM, ch...@ochsnet.com javascript: wrote:
Always having to obtain a new instance of a repeated nested message from
it's parent is really cumbersome.I fail to see the logic behind it
being that
Always having to obtain a new instance of a repeated nested message from
it's parent is really cumbersome.I fail to see the logic behind it
being that singular message fields have set_allocated.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol