Re: Backwards Compatibility of sizes and encodings.

2009-04-16 Thread Kenton Varda
We will absolutely maintain backwards-compatability of the wire format in future versions. A version of protocol buffers that wasn't backwards compatible would be thoroughly useless. However, our idea of compatibility means that newer versions of the code can successfully parse messages produced

Re: Backwards Compatibility of sizes and encodings.

2009-04-16 Thread Chris Brumgard
Thanks for getting back with me on this. Its been a while but I believe I've seen several posts that uses something akin to the following: message A { . } message B { . } message wrapper { required fixed32 size = 1; required fixed32 type = 2; optional A a = 3;