Re: PB's vs ASN.1

2009-06-23 Thread Christopher Smith

No, but in short the advantages over ASN.1 can be summed up as
"simpler, and for most cases, more efficient".


On 6/23/09, Jon M  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The system I am currently working on uses ASN.1 at the heart of the
> client/server communication. I am evaluating PB's for another part of
> the system that hasn't been implemented yet and was curious if anyone
> can point me to any articles/blogs comparing and contrasting PB's and
> ASN.1?
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
> >
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Chris

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



PB's vs ASN.1

2009-06-23 Thread Jon M

Hello,

The system I am currently working on uses ASN.1 at the heart of the
client/server communication. I am evaluating PB's for another part of
the system that hasn't been implemented yet and was curious if anyone
can point me to any articles/blogs comparing and contrasting PB's and
ASN.1?

Thanks,
Jon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---