On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Jacob Rief <jacob.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently the only feasible solution is to > replace the current FileInputStream object by a new one - which, > somehow is quite inefficient! > What makes you think it is inefficient? It does mean the buffer has to be re-allocated but with a decent malloc implementation that shouldn't take long. Certainly the actual reading from the file would take longer. Have you seen performance problems with this approach? > Wouldn't it make sense to add a member function which resets a > FileInputStream to the state of a natively opened and repositioned > file descriptor? If there really is a performance problem with allocating new objects, then sure.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
