I've implemented code generator so others can test / use our C
implementation in Python.
Another new thing is Lazy decoding support. Message are decoded on the fly
as attributes are accessed for the first time.
More info:
http://blog.connex.io/introducing-cypb-improving-the-performance-of
You ca
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Atamurad Hezretkuliyev
wrote:
>
> Following Evan's advice, I've run experiment using the repository version.
> According to my test, Google's C++ parser code is 7.6 times faster than pure
> python, which is consistent with Yang's results.
>
> Our C decoder is twice
Following Evan's advice, I've run experiment using the repository version.
According to my test, Google's C++ parser code is 7.6 times faster than pure
python, which is consistent with Yang's results.
Our C decoder is twice faster than google's c++ extension.
I've pushed the updated code and numb
On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:36 , Atamurad Hezretkuliyev wrote:
Currently our basic deserializer module is 17x faster than Google's
implementation in pure Python.
The pure python code is pretty slow. However, the repository version
(and the newly released 2.4.0 rc 1?) has C++ code to do
serializat
