Re: [protobuf] protobuf-csharp-port: binary and source release
Will it still work with depot_tools? I use gclient with several projects, it is just awesome. AFAIK, it does not support mercurial yet. Please, consider this use case before doing the change. On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote: 3 Mercurial (I plan to switch protobufs to it at some point...) On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jon Skeet sk...@pobox.com wrote: Hi all, I've recently been asked to put together a release of the protobuf- csharp-port project. The binaries and source for this version (0.9) can now be downloaded from the download page: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/downloads/list It's 0.9 because I suspect I'll want to tune the release process - the code should be fine, although obviously there's more I want to do to it. (It's a while since I've checked everything that's been happening in the Java world, for example... and I definitely want to get protogen working as a protoc plugin at some point.) In other news, I've been considering moving from the somewhat awkward github + svn source control I've currently got to *just* Mercurial hosted on Google Code. Same distributed source control goodness, but all in the same place as the rest of the project. Any thoughts? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] protobuf-csharp-port: binary and source release
Is there any concrete plan to add mercurial support to depot_tools? It sounds like the kind of thing that will not happen until someone needs it. But if no one switches to mercurial then there will never be a need. So unless there is a reasonable target date set for this support, I think we should go ahead and switch in order to create that need. Anyway, it seems like it should not be that hard to add mercurial support. http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/tools/depot_tools/scm.py Looks like git is already supported, and it only took a couple hundred lines of code (which look to be mostly comments). It will be at least a month or two before we do another release so you have some time. :) (When we switch, the existing SVN repo will stick around but will cease to be updated.) On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote: Will it still work with depot_tools? I use gclient with several projects, it is just awesome. AFAIK, it does not support mercurial yet. Please, consider this use case before doing the change. On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote: 3 Mercurial (I plan to switch protobufs to it at some point...) On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jon Skeet sk...@pobox.com wrote: Hi all, I've recently been asked to put together a release of the protobuf- csharp-port project. The binaries and source for this version (0.9) can now be downloaded from the download page: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/downloads/list It's 0.9 because I suspect I'll want to tune the release process - the code should be fine, although obviously there's more I want to do to it. (It's a while since I've checked everything that's been happening in the Java world, for example... and I definitely want to get protogen working as a protoc plugin at some point.) In other news, I've been considering moving from the somewhat awkward github + svn source control I've currently got to *just* Mercurial hosted on Google Code. Same distributed source control goodness, but all in the same place as the rest of the project. Any thoughts? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
Re: [protobuf] protobuf-csharp-port: binary and source release
3 Mercurial (I plan to switch protobufs to it at some point...) On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jon Skeet sk...@pobox.com wrote: Hi all, I've recently been asked to put together a release of the protobuf- csharp-port project. The binaries and source for this version (0.9) can now be downloaded from the download page: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/downloads/list It's 0.9 because I suspect I'll want to tune the release process - the code should be fine, although obviously there's more I want to do to it. (It's a while since I've checked everything that's been happening in the Java world, for example... and I definitely want to get protogen working as a protoc plugin at some point.) In other news, I've been considering moving from the somewhat awkward github + svn source control I've currently got to *just* Mercurial hosted on Google Code. Same distributed source control goodness, but all in the same place as the rest of the project. Any thoughts? Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprotobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
